News

Introducing a better bleeding risk score in atrial fib


 

AT THE AHA SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

References

CHICAGO – The ORBIT-AF bleeding risk score is a simple, user-friendly new tool for assessing the risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation, Emily C. O’Brien, Ph.D., announced at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

This novel score offers significant advantages over existing bleeding risk scores, including HAS-BLED and ATRIA. Those scores were developed on the basis of small numbers of bleeding events, they show inconsistent performance, and their calculation requires data that’s often not readily accessible in busy daily practice, according to Dr. O’Brien of the Duke Clinical Research Institute in Durham, N.C.

Dr. Emily C. O'Brien Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Emily C. O'Brien

The new score was derived from the ORBIT-AF registry, the largest prospective U.S. registry of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

The score was constructed using data on 7,411 AF patients in community practice settings at 173 U.S. sites. All subjects were on oral anticoagulant therapy at baseline. During 2 years of prospective follow-up, 581 patients (7.8%) experienced a major bleeding event as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.

After sifting through numerous potential candidate variables, Dr. O’Brien and coinvestigators settled upon five they identified as the most potent and practical baseline predictors of major bleeding risk while on oral anticoagulation. Then they packaged them in a convenient acronym: ORBIT, for Older than 74, Renal insufficiency with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 mL/minute per/1.73 m2, Bleeding history, Insufficient hemoglobin/hematocrit or anemia, and Treatment with an antiplatelet agent. The two strongest predictors – renal insufficiency and bleeding history– were awarded two points each; the others are worth one point each.

The observed major bleeding rate among patients enrolled in the ORBIT-AF registry rose with an increasing risk score. The same was true upon application of the ORBIT bleeding score to an independent study sample comprised of participants in the ROCKET-AF randomized clinical trial.

Dr. O’Brien also compared the performance of the ORBIT bleeding score to that of two existing bleeding risk scores – HAS-BLED and ATRIA – in the ORBIT-AF and ROCKET-AF cohorts. The simpler, more user friendly ORBIT bleeding score had a C-statistic of 0.67, similar to the 0.64 for HAS-BLED and 0.66 for ATRIA.

Thus, the ORBIT bleeding score is a practical new tool for use alongside the CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score to support clinical decision making regarding whether or not to place an individual AF patient on oral anticoagulation, Dr. O’Brien concluded.

She reported having no financial conflicts regarding this study. The ORBIT-AF registry is sponsored by Janssen.

bjancin@frontlinemedcom.com

Recommended Reading

Novel anticoagulants increase GI bleeds in elderly
MDedge Cardiology
Atrial fibrillation doubles silent cerebral infarct risk
MDedge Cardiology
Dabigatran raises major bleeding risk
MDedge Cardiology
Spotlight falls on rising levels of tricuspid valve surgery
MDedge Cardiology
Telephone CPR training boosts cardiac arrest survival
MDedge Cardiology
Novel oral hyperkalemia drug shows promise in phase III trial
MDedge Cardiology
Consider graded exercise before medications for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome
MDedge Cardiology
Polypharmacy linked to increased AFib bleeding
MDedge Cardiology
Rivaroxaban matches warfarin’s total Afib costs
MDedge Cardiology
ICD lead extraction complication rates warrant surgical backup
MDedge Cardiology